Is it wrong to have sex with someone after knowing them for only five minutes?

Say on New Years Eve you go to someone's house with a friend so he can hook up with a girl, and her friend is there also.



They are both completely hammered.



The friend of the girl who is getting nailed by your friend, who you have never met, says she wants to have sex. So you, who as a responsible sober person, obviously consent.



Is it wrong to have sex with someone after knowing them literally less than five minutes?Is it wrong to have sex with someone after knowing them for only five minutes?All part of growing up mateIs it wrong to have sex with someone after knowing them for only five minutes?
Yes, absolutely if she was hammered. She wasn't in the right mind to be making that decision.



Plus 5 minutes isn't long enough to learn details of their life. If they're married, have a boyfriend, have STD's etc.



Sure you could fire off the questions in rapid succession, but there's going to be more to it than a "yes" or "no" for most questions.



Something can always go wrong and she can become pregnant. Not knowing her for very long, you wouldn't know if she's religious or against abortion. If she kept the kid, that's now 18 years of child support.Is it wrong to have sex with someone after knowing them for only five minutes?I don't think its wrong if you're comfortable with it. Just be aware of STDs, so use a condom. I wouldn't want to have sex with someone I only knew for 5 minutes but I understand that for some people sex isn't that emotional and they're fine having sex after meeting someone five minutes before. It really just depends on the person, and if you're comfortable with it then its not wrong.
it depends on whether you think you're taking advantage of the situation and the girl or not.

would a guy who respects women and knows a girl is totally hammered and has no idea what she's saying do it?



A "responsible sober person" would not.Is it wrong to have sex with someone after knowing them for only five minutes?If the person is under the influence, you could be charged with rape. The aguement is that the person can't make conscious decisions on their own because they are impaired, and you, knowing they are impaired, are taking advantage of that.



Edit: It's not the point that she made the wrong decision, it's the point that you took advantage of someone in that situation.Is it wrong to have sex with someone after knowing them for only five minutes?
The time isn't the issue. It is that the girl was intoxicated and incapable of making a rational decision. As the sober one, it was morally wrong. And if she later changed her mind (in the act), it could be sexual assault too.
There is a big risk of catching an STD or getting her pregnant. Plus, she could file rape charges later on. The charges may very well stick, because in the eyes of the law, she was in no condition to make a rational decision, and you took advantage of that.Is it wrong to have sex with someone after knowing them for only five minutes?
Well, if she's drunk and you're sober...? That's not so good. And technically could be considered rape (although unlikely).



Whether it's morally wrong, assuming she's not impaired? I'd say no. But it's also not morally wrong to get herpes, so caveat emptor.
no, it was two consenting adults (i assume). but, uh, i'd at least ask around about her. there are only certain girls who say/do that, and they happen to also be the kind that end up on antibiotics or herpes commercials.
STD's, morals, pregnancy, blah, blah, blah. People decide with emotions and justify with reason. The bottom line is: if you feel weird about it now, then you obviously shouldn't have done it.
It is not wrong if you are both sober, or both drunk. However since you where sober and she was drunk then NO it is not okay. You should have had more respect for her.
Absolutely not, there's no law against it, and I wouldn't consider that behavior to be unethical either as you are both benefitting from it.....unless of course you or her have an STD.
Nothing is wrong or right........I all depends on your outlook. And also the outlook of the society in which you live



Medically speaking there could be hazards, getting transfer of STDs (sexually transmitted diseases)
I don't know what the political ramifications of this would be.

They do seem to do this in government a lot however.
Are you a guy or a girl? It doesn't even matter, but a point of interest.

Do what thou whilst...

Do not risk a deadly disease though.
Five minutes should be fine.



Four minutes, on the other hand...
If you would take advantage of a drunk woman, you are a real PIG. I wouldn't trust you around my pet goat.
Depends on if she ends up pregnant and whether or not you get any STDs. If not then its perfectly fine in my book.
Each person sets their own lines for right and wrong.



I'd pass.
hells no. you #$%%^%$^$% werewolf.
Actually "stupid" was the word that came to mind.
Ever hear of STD'?
yes its wrong
no it doesn't matter enjoy it lucky bro
yes!
You may have been sober, but you were not only irresponsible -- you were a predator. You preyed on a woman in a vulnerable position when you should have protected her. And in a growing number of jurisdictions your actions were criminal. Rape, indecency and assault.



I was on a jury this summer when we put a man away for 30 plus years. What did he do? He went with a woman who was drunk to her apartment. There -- he claimed -- she asked him for sex. She claims he raped him. But as the outcome shows -- the big mistake was his.



You asked is it wrong to have sex with someone when you know them less than five minutes. The answer is yes.



But there is an exceptional case. Perhaps you just married her. An arranged marriage, set up by people whom you and your wife trust and who have the interests of both of you as their deepest concern.



Still, even then, five minutes is too short. The marriage should not be made until you both get to know one another for some weeks.



Sex and marriage, the two go together. It's a shame to have one without the other, and in most times and places in civilized society it was and is a crime to have sex with someone you to whom you are not married. And sex in a long-term marriage is the greatest sex of all!



* * *



Yes, historically being drunk when you happen to kill someone is a mitigating factor for the crime of manslaughter. A modern example is the difficult fight that people who wanted drunk drivers to have a greater culpability for a death they caused while drunk. Until very recently killing by car while drunk was too often a misdemeanor, and if not then a low grade manslaughter.